Summary of the evidence for OM
Summary of the evidence for Onset Maximization
Consonant sandhi as an assimilatory phenomenon makes the most sense
if one interprets it not as a word boundary phenomenon with some
unaccountable overlap into morphology, but as a property of syllable
codas. Therefore if consonant C fails to undergo before word-internal
X the changes that it would suffer if a word boundary (ergo syllable
boundary) intervened, then the first explanation must be that C is not
in a coda, i.e., that CX is a possible onset cluster. Since this
often happens in a binary cluster which the CS theory would
obligatorily split up, this is strong evidence for the OM theory. It
is reinforced by the fact that complex onsets do occur word-initially,
and that all medial clusters are analysable as codas (with appropriate
sandhi) followed by onset sequences whose pattern is consistent with
the patterns evidenced by studying sandhi effects and the inventory of
word-initial sequences (as well as rather late evidence from the
metre).
Specifically, the onset template accepts:
- A segment followed by a segment of greater sonority. This pattern
is found widely throughout the languages of the world, and is
predicted by the Sonority Sequencing Principle (Sievers 1876:111-113), which says
that sonority should increase monotonically the closer one gets to the
sonority peak, the vowel. The universal sonority hierarchy used in Vogel (1977:135-136) and Clements (1990:292-298) fills the
bill exactly: obstruents are less sonorous than nasals, which are less
sonorous than liquids, which are less sonorous than glides.
- Non-palatal voiceless unaspirated stops before s. The
evidence comes mostly from word-initial sequences, Epic metre, and the
authority of the Taittirîyapraâtis"âkhya. But sandhi
tests cannot confirm this, since sounds like k would remain
unchanged before s whether in a preceding syllable or not.
And the sequence violates Clements's version of the Sonority
Sequencing Principle, although it would be acceptable by the original
and more common formulation that says that fricatives are more
sonorous than oral stops (Sievers
1876:112, Kiparsky 1979:432;
cf. Clements 1990:315-316).
- Voiceless fricatives (the sibilants s", s.,
s) before voiceless stops, with the dental s
assimilating in place to a following coronal. This also violates the
Sonority Sequencing Principle, except for those versions that permit
sequences that are equisonorous or nearly so (Hermann 1923:5), but seems well
justified not only by word-initial sequences and BHS metre but also by
the sandhi of s" and s.. The case of s is
harder to prove, since it only disarticulates at the end of
phonological phrases. Steriade
(1982:312-333) argued that s does not form onset
clusters, on the basis of reduplication and the fact that s
disappears between stops in the morphology. In her view, the fact
that a word-initial s before an oral stop is not copied by
reduplication processes means that it is not syllabified into the
onset, and hence is invisible to the copying process. But in Gothic,
the entire s-stop cluster reduplicated, even though otherwise
Gothic too only reduplicated one consonant: stai-staut
`pushed' vs. gai-grot `wept' (Kiparsky 1979:435), so syllabic
invisibility may not be the proper analysis of sT peculiarities in
reduplication.
- Labial sonorants(7) (m,
v), and h(8) before
sonorants. From the standpoint of the Sonority Sequencing Principle,
this is shocking. The glide v should be among the most
sonorous of all sounds, and hence not followable by any other segment
in the onset. And certainly nasals should not be followed by nasals,
if one subscribes to the version of the theory by which onset
consonants must strictly increase in sonority. There does seem good
evidence for the clusters, however. Words begin with ny,
nv, my, mr, ml, vr,
vy, hn, hr, hl, hv,
hy. While m disarticulates or assimilates before
onsets when in a coda, it is found word-internally before n,
y, r, l, and v. Similarly
av is found before n., y and perhaps
r word-internally, instead of monophthongizing to e.
And the morphology shows that h is always converted to a stop
when in a coda, so hn., hn, hm,
hr, hl, hy, hv must be onset
sequences.
Forward to Synthesis: Description
Up to Evidence for Onset Maximization
Up to Data from the R.gveda
Up to table of contents